NOTE 2 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (the “U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, which include the California-registered entities directly owned by the Company. All transactions and balances among the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated upon consolidation. The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of are recorded in the consolidated income statements from the effective date of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal, as appropriate.

A subsidiary is an entity in which (i) the Company directly or indirectly controls more than 50% of the voting power; or (ii) the Company has the power to appoint or remove the majority of the members of the board of directors or to cast a majority of votes at the meetings of the board of directors or to govern the financial and operating policies of the investee pursuant to a statute or under an agreement among the shareholders or equity holders.

Uses of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities on the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, management reviews these estimates and assumptions using the currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may cause the Company to revise its estimates. In accordance with ASC 250, the changes in estimates will be recognized in the same period of changes in facts and circumstances. The Company bases its estimates on past experiences and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Estimates are used when accounting for items and matters including, but not limited to, the allowance for credit losses of accounts receivables and loans receivable, useful lives of plant and equipment, the recoverability of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, and revenue recognition.

Risks and Uncertainties

The operations of the Company are located in the U.S., with its business activities primarily focused on route delivery services as an ISP for FedEx. Accordingly, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations may be influenced by economic, regulatory, and operational environments in the U.S., as well as the general state of the U.S. economy. The Company’s results may be subject to the following risks and uncertainties:

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash includes cash at banks that can be added to or withdrawn without limitation and time deposits with banks or other financial institutions with maturity periods of 90 days (three months) or less.

Accounts receivable, Other receivable, and Loans Receivable

The Company adopted Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13 Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 326). This standard replaced the incurred loss methodology with an expected loss methodology that is referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) methodology. CECL requires an estimate of credit losses for the remaining estimated life of the financial asset using historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts and generally applies to financial assets measured at amortized cost, including loan receivables and held-to-maturity debt securities, and some off-balance sheet credit exposures such as unfunded commitments to extend credit. Financial assets measured at amortized cost will be presented at the net amount expected to be collected by using an allowance for credit losses. In addition, CECL made changes to the accounting for available-for-sale debt securities. One such change is to require credit losses to be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down on available-for-sale debt securities if management does not intend to sell and does not believe that it is more likely than not they will be required to sell. Other receivables and loans receivable arise from transactions with non-trade customers.

Accounts receivable represent amounts due to the Company upon the completion of performance obligations for last-mile delivery services. Revenue is recognized in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy, as verified by the Weekly Independent Service Provider Charge Statement. Payments are typically received within two days of invoicing, and the Company does not extend credit or maintain significant outstanding receivables. The Company reviews the accounts receivable on a periodic basis and makes allowances when there is doubt as to the collectability of individual balances. In evaluating the collectability of individual receivable balances, the Company considers many factors, including historical losses, the age of the receivable balance, the customer’s historical payment patterns, its current credit-worthiness and financial condition, and current market conditions and economic trends. Accounts are written off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. As of February 28, 2026 and November 30, 2025, no allowance for credit losses was recorded, as all outstanding balances were considered fully collectible.

Plant and equipment

Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment charges, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which do not materially extend the useful lives of the assets, are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is calculated primarily based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets:

​

​

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets to be held-and-used for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If an impairment indicator is present, the Company evaluates recoverability by comparing the carrying amount of the asset group to the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flow over the remaining useful life of the asset group. If the carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount, an impairment loss is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair value of the asset. The Company estimates fair value using the expected future cash flows discounted at a rate consistent with the risks associated with the recovery of the assets. Based on the above analysis, no impairment loss was recognized for the three months ended February 28, 2026 and 2025.

Fair value of financial instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Unless otherwise disclosed, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans receivable, and other current assets, accounts payable, due to a related party, loans payable, other payables and other current liabilities, approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities as of February 28, 2026 and November 30, 2025, based upon the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.

Prepaid Insurance and Premium Financing

The Company obtains certain insurance coverage through premium financing arrangements. Under these arrangements, the financing company pays the insurance premiums directly to the insurance carrier on behalf of the Company, and the Company is obligated to repay the financing company in periodic installments, including interest.

At inception, the full amount of the insurance premium is recorded as prepaid insurance within prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets, with a corresponding premium financing payable recorded within current liabilities. Prepaid insurance is amortized to insurance expense on a straight-line basis over the coverage period of the related policies. Interest incurred on the financing arrangement is recognized separately as interest expense as incurred.

Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Amounts paid for an acquisition are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The accounting for business combinations requires estimates and judgment in determining the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and contingent consideration transferred, if any, regarding expectations of future cash flows of the acquired business, and the allocation of those cash flows to the identifiable intangible assets. The determination of fair value is based on management’s estimates and assumptions, as well as other information compiled by management, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. If actual results differ from these estimates, the amounts recorded in the financial statements could result in a possible impairment of intangible assets and goodwill. Consideration transferred in a business acquisition is measured at the fair value as of the date of acquisition. Acquisition-related expenses are expensed when incurred.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired in a business combination are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company records goodwill as the excess of the consideration transferred over the fair value of net assets acquired in business combinations. Goodwill was recognized in connection with the acquisition of JAR on October 25, 2024 (See Note 7, “Acquisition”). Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment annually at the reporting unit level or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it may be impaired. The Company has an option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. In the qualitative assessment, the Company considers primary factors such as industry and market considerations, overall financial performance of the reporting unit which is described in more detail below, and other specific information related to the operations. Based on the qualitative assessment, if it is more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, the quantitative impairment test is performed.

The Company tests goodwill and intangible assets that are not subject to amortization for impairment annually on November 30, and the Company’s goodwill impairment review involves the following steps: 1) qualitative assessment – evaluate qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, including goodwill. The factors the Company considers include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market considerations, cost factors, financial performance, and events specific to that reporting unit. If, or when, the Company determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, including goodwill, the Company would then change to the quantitative method; 2) quantitative method –the Company performs the quantitative fair value test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount and an impairment charge is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The Company has one reporting unit. Impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying value of goodwill. No impairment of goodwill was recorded for the three months ended February 28, 2026 and 2025.

The Company’s intangible asset consists of the customer relationship acquired as part of the JAR Acquisition. The asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life, as outlined below:

​

​

Revenue recognition

ASC 606 establishes principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The core principle requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services as performance obligations are satisfied. ASC 606 applies a five-step model for revenue recognition, which requires the Company to: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, including variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant future reversal will not occur, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the respective performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies the performance obligation.

The Company is engaged in providing last-mile delivery services as an Independent Service Provider (ISP) for FedEx and provides logistics solutions primarily in the United States. The Company coordinates with FedEx for the transport of goods pursuant to FedEx’s instructions and the end-recipient’s designated destination (the end-recipient is FedEx’s customer, not the Company’s). Once the goods arrive at the end-recipient’s designated destination, the end-recipient acknowledges the delivery note—this confirmation serves as evidence of the Company’s completion of delivery services for FedEx, and the transfer of control of the service obligation to FedEx is deemed complete, marking the successful fulfillment of the logistics services for FedEx. The Company derives all revenue from both fixed service charges and activity-based charges under its ISP Agreement with FedEx. Performance obligations under the ISP Agreement include (i) weekly continuous service coverage for designated service areas (fixed weekly service charges), (ii) execution of delivery and pickup stops for FedEx (stop charges and e-commerce stop charges), (iii) handling and delivering packages for FedEx (package charges, including e-commerce and large package deliveries), and (iv) compliance with FedEx’s brand and branding requirements (apparel and vehicle branding fees).

Revenue is recognized as follows:

Each service task assigned by FedEx (including stop execution and package delivery) is a distinct component of the overall performance obligations under the ISP Agreement; the aggregate of these tasks constitutes the single ongoing performance obligation of providing last-mile delivery services to FedEx as an ISP. The transaction price under the ISP Agreement is determined based on mutually negotiated fixed and variable charges (Negotiated Charges) between the Company and FedEx, documented in the ISP Agreement’s Schedule C and related attachments. The fixed component (weekly service charges) is set at the inception of the rate term; the variable component (activity-based charges) is tied to the actual volume of services completed (e.g., number of stops, packages handled) and includes fuel surcharges that adjust weekly based on market fuel prices. There are no rebates, returns, or other material variable consideration provisions outside of the agreed activity-based charges. As FedEx is the Company’s sole counterparty, there is no prepayment requirement from customers; the Company and FedEx settle service fees based on FedEx’s official confirmation of the actual completed service volume for each settlement period. Since the fixed and activity-based charges under the ISP Agreement are explicitly tied to separate, distinct performance obligations (continuous service coverage vs. per-unit activity execution), no allocation of the transaction price is required under ASC 606. For activity-based revenue, It is recognized at a point in time when control of the service (for FedEx) is transferred and the delivery is completed to the end-recipient’s designated destination, as evidenced by the end-recipient’s signature on the delivery note and subsequent verification by FedEx. Transit periods for individual delivery tasks typically do not exceed one month, and the Company and FedEx settle all service fees on a regular contractual basis. The Company has a contractual credit term with FedEx for service fee settlement, with standard payment terms of one week.

Revenue is presented on a gross basis, as the Company acts as the principal in the transaction with FedEx. This conclusion is based on the following considerations: i) the Company manages all aspects of the last-mile delivery process for FedEx and exercises full control over the delivery service before transferring the completed service to FedEx; ii) the Company has the contractual right to negotiate all fixed and activity-based charges (Negotiated Charges) with FedEx and bears the operational and market risks associated with service delivery (e.g., fluctuations in labor, fuel, and equipment costs); iii) The Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide delivery services in meeting FedEx’s service requirements and FedEx’s customer (end-recipient) delivery expectations, including resolving delivery-related complaints and assuming liability for service failures.

Cost of revenue

Cost of revenue primarily includes direct expenses incurred to fulfill the Company’s obligations under the ISP Agreement with FedEx. These costs consist of (i) driver compensation and benefits; (ii) depreciation and amortization expenses; (iii) fuel expenses; (iv) vehicle maintenance and leasing expenses; (v) insurance premiums related to vehicle and liability coverage, and (vi) other operational expenses such as route management systems, uniforms, and branding compliance. All expenses are directly attributable to the Company’s delivery operations and are recognized in the same period as the corresponding revenue.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to a concentration of credit risk due to its reliance on a single customer, FedEx, which accounted for 100% of the Company’s revenue for all periods presented in this report. Accounts receivable are unsecured and derived from revenue earned under the Company’s ISP Agreement with FedEx. The Company’s accounts receivable are typically collected within two days of invoicing, and no allowance for credit loss was recorded as of February 28, 2026 and November 30, 2025. The Company’s reliance on FedEx represents a significant concentration of revenue and accounts receivable. This concentration reflects the Company’s business model as an exclusive service provider to FedEx under its ISP Agreement.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for using the asset and liability method, as prescribed under ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

Prior to its acquisition by the Company, JAR (the Predecessor), as an S-Corporation, was not subject to federal corporate income tax, and its taxable income, deductions, and credits were passed through to its stockholders. The Predecessor was subject to the California corporate franchise tax under RTC § 23802, which requires S-Corporations to pay the greater of a minimum tax of $800 or 1.5% of net taxable income derived from California sources. In accordance with ASC 740-10-15-4, deferred tax assets and liabilities were recognized for state-level temporary differences and net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards. Following the Acquisition, the Predecessor became a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, a C-Corporation, and is subject to corporate income tax under the Internal Revenue Code and applicable state tax laws.

ASC 740 requires a tax position to meet a recognition threshold before it is recognized in the financial statements. The Company assesses uncertain tax positions based on management’s evaluation of whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. This assessment includes consideration of any potential appeals or litigation processes based on the technical merits of the tax position. Because significant assumptions and judgments are involved in determining whether a tax benefit is more likely than not to be sustained, actual results may differ from estimates under different assumptions or conditions. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as part of the income tax provision in the consolidated statements of operations.

Loss per share

The Company computes loss per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” (“ASC 260”). ASC 260 requires companies with complex capital structures to present basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as net income divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., convertible securities, options, and warrants) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS. For the three months ended February 28, 2026 and 2025, there were no dilutive shares outstanding.

Related parties and transactions

The Company identifies related parties, and accounts for and discloses related party transactions in accordance with ASC 850, “Related Party Disclosures” and other relevant ASC standards.

Parties, which can be a corporation or individual, are considered to be related if the Company has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operational decisions. Companies are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence.

Transactions between related parties commonly occurring in the normal course of business are considered to be related party transactions. Transactions between related parties are considered to be related party transactions even though they may not be given accounting recognition.

Segment reporting

An operating segment is a component of the Company that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenue and incur expenses and is identified on the basis of the internal financial reports that are provided to and regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources and assess performance of the segment.

In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting, operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s revenue segments have similar economic characteristics, and they are managed as a single business unit. The Company uses the “management approach” in determining reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source for determining the Company’s reportable segments. The Company’s CODM has been identified as the chief executive officer (the “CEO”), who reviews consolidated results when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company. The Company has determined that there is only one reportable operating segment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company considers the applicability and impact of all ASUs. Management periodically reviews new accounting standards that are issued. Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended (the “JOBS Act”), the Company meets the definition of an emerging growth company and has elected the extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards, which delays the adoption of these accounting standards until they would apply to private companies.

In July 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-05, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses for Accounts Receivable and Contract Assets. The amendment provides (1) all entities with a practical expedient to assume that current conditions as of the balance sheet date do not change for the remaining life of the assets and (2) entities other than public business entities with an accounting policy election to consider collection activity after the balance sheet date when estimating expected credit losses for current accounts receivable and current contract assets arising from transactions accounted for under Topic 606. This guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2025 and interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the above new accounting pronouncements or guidance on the combined financial statements.

In September 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-06, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-use Software: Targeted Improvements to the Accounting for Internal-use Software which amends the guidance in ASC 350-40, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software. The amendments modernize the recognition and disclosure framework for internal-use software costs, removing the previous “development stage” model and introducing a more judgment-based approach. ASU 2025-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-10 – Accounting for Government Grants Received by Business Entities (“ASU 2025-10”), to establish guidance on the recognition, measurement, and presentation of government grants received by business entities. ASU 2025-10 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2028 (year ending December 31, 2029 for the Company). The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2025-10 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In December 2025, the FASB issued ASU 2025-11—Interim Reporting (Topic 270): Narrow Scope Improvements, which clarifies the current requirements under Topic 270. The ASU provides a comprehensive list of required interim disclosures and requires entities to disclose events since the end of the last annual reporting period that have a material impact on the entity. ASU 2025-11 is effective for public entities for interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2027 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the standard will have to the consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

The Company’s management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective, authoritative guidance, if currently adopted, would have a material impact on the Company’s financial statement presentation or disclosures.

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS DESCRIPTION

Elite Express Holding Inc. (“ETS” or the “Company”) was incorporated on April 3, 2024, under the laws of the State of Delaware. The Company is a holding entity that was formed for the purpose of acquiring JAR Transportation Inc (“JAR”).

JAR was incorporated in the State of California on May 27, 2020 under Subchapter S of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company operated as an Independent Service Provider (“ISP”) for Federal Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”), providing last-mile package delivery services. As part of FedEx Corporation’s “One FedEx” consolidation, effective June 1, 2024, FXG merged into Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx”). JAR’s ISP contract with FXG remained in place until October 12, 2024, after which the subsequent agreement was signed with FedEx. Unless otherwise specified, references to “FedEx” in this document include FXG for periods before October 12, 2024, and Federal Express Corporation thereafter.

On October 25, 2024, the Company acquired all issued and outstanding shares of JAR for a total consideration of $1,367,169 in cash, pursuant to a stock purchase agreement dated September 16, 2024 along with Amendment No.2 to stock purchase agreement dated November 22, 2024 (the “JAR Acquisition”). As of October 25, 2024, JAR ceased to be an S-Corporation and became a wholly owned subsidiary of ETS, a C-Corporation. Refer to Note 7. Acquisition, for additional information.

References to “Successor” or “Successor Company” relate to the financial position and results of operations of the Company after the JAR Acquisition. References to “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Company” refer to the financial position and results of operations of JAR.

The Company operates exclusively within the State of California. As an ISP, the Company is granted relative exclusivity in certain service areas by FedEx, which minimizes direct competition within those regions and enables the Company to focus on operational efficiency and service quality.

Details of the subsidiaries of the Company as of the reporting date are set out below:

​

​

NOTE 7 — ACQUISITION

On September 16, 2024, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) to acquire 100% of JAR with the total gross price of $1,475,000 as specified in the original Purchase Agreement. In accordance with the terms of the Purchase agreement, the Company made an initial payment of $44,250 (“First Payment”) to the Escrow Account within three days after the Purchase Agreement was signed. The Company subsequently made payment of $398,250 (“Second Payment”) on October 22, 2024. Following these payments, the transaction terms were revised through two amendments. Following revisions in the first amendment, the final consideration was reduced to $1,367,169. Pursuant to the second amendment, the stock transfer date was set as October 25, 2024, which is considered the acquisition date for accounting purposes under ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The Company made two additional payments totaling $899,669 (“Third and Fourth Payments”) after the acquisition date of October 25, 2024 and prior to the transaction’s official closing date of December 3, 2024. The remaining $25,000, which is contractually due within thirty days of the first anniversary of the Fourth Payment, has been accrued and included in the total purchase consideration recognized in connection with the acquisition.

The Company and JAR were unrelated parties. There was no common control between the Company and JAR prior to JAR’s acquisition by the Company. Immediately after the acquisition date on October 25, 2024, the Company took control of JAR in accordance with the Purchase Agreement. No members of JAR remain in governance or management positions in the Company post-acquisition. Based on the above factors, the Company assessed the appropriate accounting treatment under ASC 805 and concluded that the Company is the accounting acquirer. JAR became a 100% owned subsidiary of the Company after the acquisition date of October 25, 2024.

As part of the transaction structure, certain assets and liabilities, including cash, accounts receivable, and outstanding debt, were excluded from the acquisition and remained the responsibility of the sellers of JAR. The Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination using the purchase method of accounting. In accordance with ASC 805, the purchase price was allocated to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based on their estimated fair values at the acquisition date.

The Company completed the initial purchase price allocation for the acquisition of JAR as of October 25, 2024. Assets (vehicles) acquired were recorded at estimated fair values as of the acquisition date based on management’s estimates, available information, and supportable assumptions that management considered reasonable. No liabilities were assumed per the Purchase Agreement.

As part of the purchase price allocation, a deferred tax liability (“DTL”) was recognized for the basis difference in the acquired identifiable intangible asset—customer relationships. In accordance with ASC 805-740-25-3, no DTL was recognized for the reported amount of goodwill that is not deductible for tax purposes. The recognition of the DTL related to customer relationships resulted in a corresponding increase in goodwill, as required under ASC 805. Although the Company recognized a portion of DTL and goodwill based on its initial assessment, the valuation process is ongoing, and the final purchase price allocation, including the measurement of goodwill and deferred taxes, may be subject to further adjustments. The Company will continue to evaluate and refine the allocation based on additional information obtained during the measurement period in accordance with ASC 805.

The allocation of the purchase price to the major classes of assets as of October 25, 2024 is as follows:

​

The fair value of customer relationship was determined using assumptions that are representative of those typically used by a market participant in estimating fair value.

The fair value of the identified intangible asset, i.e. customer relationship, and its estimated average useful life as of February 28, 2026 and November 30, 2025 are as follows:

​

​

Amortization expense was $13,800 and $13,800 for the three months ended February 28, 2026, and February 28, 2025, respectively.

Basis of presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (the “U.S. GAAP”) and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary. All inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated upon consolidation.

Uses of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities on the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. On an ongoing basis, management reviews these estimates and assumptions using the currently available information. Changes in facts and circumstances may cause the Company to revise its estimates. In accordance with ASC 250, the changes in estimates will be recognized in the same period of changes in facts and circumstances. The Company bases its estimates on past experiences and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Estimates are used when accounting for items and matters including, but not limited to, the allowance for credit losses of accounts receivables and loans receivable, useful lives of plant and equipment, the recoverability of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, and revenue recognition.

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash includes cash at banks that can be added to or withdrawn without limitation and time deposits with banks or other financial institutions with maturity periods of 90 days (three months) or less.

Plant and equipment

Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment charges, if any. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs, which do not materially extend the useful lives of the assets, are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is calculated primarily based on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets:

​

Fair value of financial instruments

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. A three-level fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy requires entities to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Unless otherwise disclosed, the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments, including cash equivalents, accounts receivable, loans receivable, and other current assets, accounts payable, due to a related party, loans payable, other payables and other current liabilities, approximate the fair value of the respective assets and liabilities as of February 28, 2026 and November 30, 2025, based upon the short-term nature of the assets and liabilities.

Business Combinations

Business combinations are accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805, Business Combinations. Amounts paid for an acquisition are allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the date of acquisition. The accounting for business combinations requires estimates and judgment in determining the fair value of assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and contingent consideration transferred, if any, regarding expectations of future cash flows of the acquired business, and the allocation of those cash flows to the identifiable intangible assets. The determination of fair value is based on management’s estimates and assumptions, as well as other information compiled by management, including valuations that utilize customary valuation procedures and techniques. If actual results differ from these estimates, the amounts recorded in the financial statements could result in a possible impairment of intangible assets and goodwill. Consideration transferred in a business acquisition is measured at the fair value as of the date of acquisition. Acquisition-related expenses are expensed when incurred.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets acquired in a business combination are not amortized but are tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable, in accordance with ASC 350, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other.

Revenue recognition

ASC 606 establishes principles for reporting information about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The core principle requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services as performance obligations are satisfied. ASC 606 applies a five-step model for revenue recognition, which requires the Company to: (i) identify the contract with the customer, (ii) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (iii) determine the transaction price, including variable consideration to the extent that it is probable that a significant future reversal will not occur, (iv) allocate the transaction price to the respective performance obligations in the contract, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies the performance obligation.

The Company is engaged in providing last-mile delivery services as an Independent Service Provider (ISP) for FedEx and provides logistics solutions primarily in the United States. The Company coordinates with FedEx for the transport of goods pursuant to FedEx’s instructions and the end-recipient’s designated destination (the end-recipient is FedEx’s customer, not the Company’s). Once the goods arrive at the end-recipient’s designated destination, the end-recipient acknowledges the delivery note—this confirmation serves as evidence of the Company’s completion of delivery services for FedEx, and the transfer of control of the service obligation to FedEx is deemed complete, marking the successful fulfillment of the logistics services for FedEx. The Company derives all revenue from both fixed service charges and activity-based charges under its ISP Agreement with FedEx. Performance obligations under the ISP Agreement include (i) weekly continuous service coverage for designated service areas (fixed weekly service charges), (ii) execution of delivery and pickup stops for FedEx (stop charges and e-commerce stop charges), (iii) handling and delivering packages for FedEx (package charges, including e-commerce and large package deliveries), and (iv) compliance with FedEx’s brand and branding requirements (apparel and vehicle branding fees).

Revenue is recognized as follows:

Each service task assigned by FedEx (including stop execution and package delivery) is a distinct component of the overall performance obligations under the ISP Agreement; the aggregate of these tasks constitutes the single ongoing performance obligation of providing last-mile delivery services to FedEx as an ISP. The transaction price under the ISP Agreement is determined based on mutually negotiated fixed and variable charges (Negotiated Charges) between the Company and FedEx, documented in the ISP Agreement’s Schedule C and related attachments. The fixed component (weekly service charges) is set at the inception of the rate term; the variable component (activity-based charges) is tied to the actual volume of services completed (e.g., number of stops, packages handled) and includes fuel surcharges that adjust weekly based on market fuel prices. There are no rebates, returns, or other material variable consideration provisions outside of the agreed activity-based charges. As FedEx is the Company’s sole counterparty, there is no prepayment requirement from customers; the Company and FedEx settle service fees based on FedEx’s official confirmation of the actual completed service volume for each settlement period. Since the fixed and activity-based charges under the ISP Agreement are explicitly tied to separate, distinct performance obligations (continuous service coverage vs. per-unit activity execution), no allocation of the transaction price is required under ASC 606. For activity-based revenue, It is recognized at a point in time when control of the service (for FedEx) is transferred and the delivery is completed to the end-recipient’s designated destination, as evidenced by the end-recipient’s signature on the delivery note and subsequent verification by FedEx. Transit periods for individual delivery tasks typically do not exceed one month, and the Company and FedEx settle all service fees on a regular contractual basis. The Company has a contractual credit term with FedEx for service fee settlement, with standard payment terms of one week.

Revenue is presented on a gross basis, as the Company acts as the principal in the transaction with FedEx. This conclusion is based on the following considerations: i) the Company manages all aspects of the last-mile delivery process for FedEx and exercises full control over the delivery service before transferring the completed service to FedEx; ii) the Company has the contractual right to negotiate all fixed and activity-based charges (Negotiated Charges) with FedEx and bears the operational and market risks associated with service delivery (e.g., fluctuations in labor, fuel, and equipment costs); iii) The Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise to provide delivery services in meeting FedEx’s service requirements and FedEx’s customer (end-recipient) delivery expectations, including resolving delivery-related complaints and assuming liability for service failures.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to a concentration of credit risk due to its reliance on a single customer, FedEx, which accounted for 100% of the Company’s revenue for all periods presented in this report. Accounts receivable are unsecured and derived from revenue earned under the Company’s ISP Agreement with FedEx. The Company’s accounts receivable are typically collected within two days of invoicing, and no allowance for credit loss was recorded as of February 28, 2026 and November 30, 2025. The Company’s reliance on FedEx represents a significant concentration of revenue and accounts receivable. This concentration reflects the Company’s business model as an exclusive service provider to FedEx under its ISP Agreement.

Loss per share

The Company computes loss per share (“EPS”) in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings per Share” (“ASC 260”). ASC 260 requires companies with complex capital structures to present basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is measured as net income divided by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS presents the dilutive effect on a per share basis of potential common shares (e.g., convertible securities, options, and warrants) as if they had been converted at the beginning of the periods presented, or issuance date, if later. Potential common shares that have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e., those that increase income per share or decrease loss per share) are excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS. For the three months ended February 28, 2026 and 2025, there were no dilutive shares outstanding.

Segment reporting

An operating segment is a component of the Company that engages in business activities from which it may earn revenue and incur expenses and is identified on the basis of the internal financial reports that are provided to and regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker in order to allocate resources and assess performance of the segment.

In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting, operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’s revenue segments have similar economic characteristics, and they are managed as a single business unit. The Company uses the “management approach” in determining reportable operating segments. The management approach considers the internal organization and reporting used by the Company’s chief operating decision maker for making operating decisions and assessing performance as the source for determining the Company’s reportable segments. The Company’s CODM has been identified as the chief executive officer (the “CEO”), who reviews consolidated results when making decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance of the Company. The Company has determined that there is only one reportable operating segment.

​

​

​

​

The total future minimum lease payments of short-term lease under the non-cancellable operating lease with respect to the office as of February 28, 2026 are payable as follows:

NOTE 3 —  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable consists of the following:

​

​

As of the issuance date of this report, the February 28, 2026, and November 30, 2025, accounts receivable balances have been fully collected.

The allocation of the purchase price to the major classes of assets as of October 25, 2024 is as follows:

​